It can be a really daunting task when it comes to learning tax "lingo;" one of the hardest things about taxes is understanding the jargon used. There is no need to be stressed about it though. With the help of a tax lawyer, you can manage to learn and grasp the tax language at your fingertips.
1. Credits: These are much similar to the credits you get at a local store. Once you have computed your tax bill, you can use the credit to reduce the total amount on the check you will "grudgingly" write to Uncle Sam. Credits are generally better than deductions because they directly subtract the amount of tax you are required to pay as opposed to reducing the total some of taxed income.
2. Progressive Taxation: This is a method whereby as earning levels increase, so do the rates of taxes.
3. Adjusted Gross Income (AGI): This refers to all earnings that you receive during one whole year. It includes wages, dividends, and interest.
4. Deductions: These refer to the costs that the IRS allows you to subtract from your AGI so that you may calculate your total taxable income. Generally, the lower your income, the lower the amount of tax bills you have to pay.
5. Standard Deduction: This refers to a fixed amount that the tax payer can subtract from his/her earnings. It is determined by the status of the individual's filing position. Due to fluctuation in inflation, the rates change each year. This method eradicates the necessity to itemize specific deductions.
6. Exemption: This is the total sum from which you subtract your earnings to reveal everyone who counts (or depends) on your income such as your spouse, children, or relatives (such as parents).
7. Withholding: This is a system whereby taxes are deducted from earnings before you receive your paycheck.
8. Taxable Income: This refers to your total income, trimmed down by all permissible deductions and exemptions. It is what you use to determine how much tax you need to pay.
9. Voluntary Compliance: This is a system where individuals report their income, file their tax return, and pay their tax debt on time.
10. Itemized deductions: These are costs that can be subtracted from your AGI to assist you in getting a lesser amount of your income on which you must in calculating your tax bill. They include mortgage interest, medical expenses, casualty, theft loss, gambling losses, and charitable contributions. Some of these deductions must meet the IRS regulations before they are claimed, so check to make sure they fall under their guidelines.
Now that you've familiarized yourself with some of these tax terms, it's time to file away!
Robert L. Daniel and partners of Limon Whitaker & Morgan, for years have helped businesses and individuals Nationwide, with their delinquent IRS & State tax problems. The firm is based in Los Angeles, California USA. http://www.limonwhitaker.com / Tel:888.321.2430
You have permission to republish and use this article in your newsletter,website,or blog as long as you leave the article fully intact, and include this resource box at the end of the article.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6125739
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
The Tax Code Is Upside Down: By Abe Gaskins
The capital gain rate of 15% is BAD for the long term strategy of America. Here's why: a Wall Street financial investment concern can buy a company and hold it for a year and then sell it one year later and only pay 15% in taxes. I'm going to paint with a wide brush, but here goes: typically these financial concerns will not plan on investments that require a long term vision. Most will strip down companies and boost up the EBITA of the company so that they can look for an "exit strategy", which means that they are looking for a quick way to cash out. They are looking for ways to "bundle it up and package it" for resell. Like they did with all the junk real estate packages and derivatives that got us into this economic mess. To continue painting, these companies do not care about the long term infrastructure of the company and do not care about the USA's manufacturing basis. All they care about is a return on their investment--the proverbial: ROI--and a way out. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a non-profit type of guy. I believe whole heartedly in profits. But not at the expense of future of America: not with the incentive to destroy an industry like Wall Street did to the building industry.
The tax rate structure is exactly opposite of that which it should be. Companies in the USA should be paying 15% taxes on income and the Capital Gain rate should be 35%. That would put the emphasis on growth and investment. If companies paid a 15% income tax, then capital could be rolled back into America's manufacturing base at an accelerated pace. Maybe we could actually be making TV's in America, Maybe we could be manufacturing our toys and furniture here. Just maybe.
When a company sells to another, they are saying I'm done and I want to retire and start consuming the wealth that I have created. There's nothing wrong with that, that is the American way. I hope to do that some day. The problem is that the tax system pounds the entrepreneur with high taxes while they are in the trenches building a company and then ease up at the time when they want to sell. This type of tax structure comes out of the lobbying efforts of Wall Street. The financial types from Wall Street never built the company, never were in the trenches. They bypass the trenches--to use Monopoly lingo: they receive a "get-out-of-jail-free" card, collect $200, get to go to "GO"--and only pay 15%--on billions of profits on a single transaction. They have billions of dollars and have lobbied the legislative process to get the tax code to benefit them. They have done a great job of selling the low capital gains rate to the average American. And of course the big corporations have enough dough to lobby for special tax provisions from which only they can benefit. The rest of the small business brethren, the ones that actually do create the most employment, are the ones that carry the greatest tax burden. Go figure. Wall Street has done it by convincing the American's not to consider a graduated capital gains rate and to shift the tax burden on small businesses.
I do not believe for one minute that a low capital gains rate and a high corporate tax rate promotes growth. This is contrary to conventional thought, but it is common sense. The ironic thing is that it is entirely possible for us to get our-cake-and-eat-it-too. With a lower corporate tax rate on America's manufacturing, the economic basis could increase and when they do decide to sell out, then the US Treasury might just benefit as result of a larger basis from which to glean taxes and fund necessary social programs. Maybe the demand for social programs could be less because people are working. Just maybe.
Why not have a graduated capital gains rate. That way the middle class American can benefit by investing in the stock market. Keep the capital gains rate at 15% on gains less then, say, one million dollars and then graduate it up to the top rate of 35% which is the current top rate for corporations. (gee-sh, please don't beat the drum about a million dollar gain and "what is middle class". It's only a thought experiment.) Even Warren Buffet will publicly admit that a 15% capital gains rate for the billionaires on Wall Street is ridiculous. (Of course privately he's probably lobbying like crazy to keep status quo, but that's total conjecture.) This way we are actually taxing on consumption and not taxing companies who are trying to build wealth. The incentive to build wealth also creates employment. And that is what we need in the United States right now.
I know what the Wall Street defense will be: capital will just flow overseas. To which my reply is: tax those unpatriotic umpty-umpts for expatriation of the funds that we need: and for being as unpatriotic as that comment. Maybe they could figure out a financial strategy to fund small business, which they don't do...and have never done... Maybe with a lower corporate tax rate, foreign capital would actually flow into the United States manufacturing arena because of rational tax law...Just maybe.
I think the way to do this is to create a Sub-chapter G corporation. "G" is for growth. That way old fogies like me won't be penalized for a tax policy change. We can continue under the old rules. Or we could opt for the new type of corporation if we wanted to invest in the company for another ten years. That's the horizon we should target our resources--ten years. Not a one year horizon. In order for a seed to grow, you have to water the plant when it germinates. High corporate taxes take away that metaphorical water. But I guess that's just common sense. I'd be better off looking for a-buck under my pillow from the Tooth Fairy.
That's my 2 cents, of course, after taxes, it's only 1.3 cents!
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6094402
The tax rate structure is exactly opposite of that which it should be. Companies in the USA should be paying 15% taxes on income and the Capital Gain rate should be 35%. That would put the emphasis on growth and investment. If companies paid a 15% income tax, then capital could be rolled back into America's manufacturing base at an accelerated pace. Maybe we could actually be making TV's in America, Maybe we could be manufacturing our toys and furniture here. Just maybe.
When a company sells to another, they are saying I'm done and I want to retire and start consuming the wealth that I have created. There's nothing wrong with that, that is the American way. I hope to do that some day. The problem is that the tax system pounds the entrepreneur with high taxes while they are in the trenches building a company and then ease up at the time when they want to sell. This type of tax structure comes out of the lobbying efforts of Wall Street. The financial types from Wall Street never built the company, never were in the trenches. They bypass the trenches--to use Monopoly lingo: they receive a "get-out-of-jail-free" card, collect $200, get to go to "GO"--and only pay 15%--on billions of profits on a single transaction. They have billions of dollars and have lobbied the legislative process to get the tax code to benefit them. They have done a great job of selling the low capital gains rate to the average American. And of course the big corporations have enough dough to lobby for special tax provisions from which only they can benefit. The rest of the small business brethren, the ones that actually do create the most employment, are the ones that carry the greatest tax burden. Go figure. Wall Street has done it by convincing the American's not to consider a graduated capital gains rate and to shift the tax burden on small businesses.
I do not believe for one minute that a low capital gains rate and a high corporate tax rate promotes growth. This is contrary to conventional thought, but it is common sense. The ironic thing is that it is entirely possible for us to get our-cake-and-eat-it-too. With a lower corporate tax rate on America's manufacturing, the economic basis could increase and when they do decide to sell out, then the US Treasury might just benefit as result of a larger basis from which to glean taxes and fund necessary social programs. Maybe the demand for social programs could be less because people are working. Just maybe.
Why not have a graduated capital gains rate. That way the middle class American can benefit by investing in the stock market. Keep the capital gains rate at 15% on gains less then, say, one million dollars and then graduate it up to the top rate of 35% which is the current top rate for corporations. (gee-sh, please don't beat the drum about a million dollar gain and "what is middle class". It's only a thought experiment.) Even Warren Buffet will publicly admit that a 15% capital gains rate for the billionaires on Wall Street is ridiculous. (Of course privately he's probably lobbying like crazy to keep status quo, but that's total conjecture.) This way we are actually taxing on consumption and not taxing companies who are trying to build wealth. The incentive to build wealth also creates employment. And that is what we need in the United States right now.
I know what the Wall Street defense will be: capital will just flow overseas. To which my reply is: tax those unpatriotic umpty-umpts for expatriation of the funds that we need: and for being as unpatriotic as that comment. Maybe they could figure out a financial strategy to fund small business, which they don't do...and have never done... Maybe with a lower corporate tax rate, foreign capital would actually flow into the United States manufacturing arena because of rational tax law...Just maybe.
I think the way to do this is to create a Sub-chapter G corporation. "G" is for growth. That way old fogies like me won't be penalized for a tax policy change. We can continue under the old rules. Or we could opt for the new type of corporation if we wanted to invest in the company for another ten years. That's the horizon we should target our resources--ten years. Not a one year horizon. In order for a seed to grow, you have to water the plant when it germinates. High corporate taxes take away that metaphorical water. But I guess that's just common sense. I'd be better off looking for a-buck under my pillow from the Tooth Fairy.
That's my 2 cents, of course, after taxes, it's only 1.3 cents!
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6094402
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
